Updated July 7, 2020

The following document was unanimously endorsed by the JWN Executive Board submitted to City Council on June 8, 2020.

A conversation borne from frustration for how the unhoused were managed during the COVID 19 crisis and the resulting neighborhood impacts between myself, Heather Selicki Operations Coordinator at White Bird, and Laurie Hauber, Staff Attorney, Oregon Law Center/Lane County Legal Aid has resulted in a series of recommendations for mitigating some of the impacts of homelessness on neighborhoods as well as blunting the effects on homeless people of using police, with the resulting high costs, to enforce the camping ban. We feel that these are relatively minor adjustments that do not involve changes in ordinances, still regulates camping, and can set us on a path for a more serious effort on short term harm reduction. It also places agency and responsibility on the homeless themselves as well as starting a conversation on the best uses for sworn officers. Moreover, these recommendations can set the stage for future cooperation between service providers, neighborhoods, businesses, and the city and county on practical solutions.

This came together at the last minute when we realized there was no exit strategy for homeless campers going into Phase 2 and the endorsements here were gathered in only three days. An amended submission with more signatures and organizations will be submitted soon, as the providers are meeting June 9 and more neighborhood association boards will be able to meet and vote.


Where Can People Go?  City of Eugene Homeless Services Immediate Policy Recommendations

“For those of us working on policies that intersect with re-opening and law enforcement, we can make public our commitment to establishing policies that don’t create more harm.” – Oregon Public Health Association

In the past three months, social distancing measures have left us with only 250 shelter beds for the thousands of people experiencing homelessness in Lane County, 45% fewer spaces than we had at this same time last year. On Friday, the temporary respite sites that provided overflow capacity for people to shelter-in-place will close, leaving those who sought refuge there to join with the flood of newly unhoused people as residential evictions resume.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Federal advisor on the COVID-19 pandemic, along with top epidemiologists, have stated that without a vaccine this virus will likely be with us for the next six to twelve months or more. The CDC clearly recommends that the unhoused need sanctioned places to shelter in small social distancing groups. Lane County has a population of 4,100 unhoused people. Research estimates that up to 40% of people experiencing homelessness could be infected during the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic without efforts to prevent the spread of this disease.

The City and County have expended significant time and money responding to unhoused complaints:  citing, arresting, adjudicating, and jailing the unhoused because they do not have the resources to maintain shelter, sanitation, or garbage disposal. Penalizing people for having nowhere to go has tremendous costs, both to the unhoused individuals and the community at large.  Whether intentional or not, punitive measures against people who are unhoused create additional, often insurmountable barriers for people to access housing and employment.  The accumulation of debt from unpaid fines, which adversely impacts credit scores, along with outstanding warrants and/or jail time traps people in a cycle of homelessness that becomes increasingly difficult to overcome.

The mere threat of a citation takes a significant toll as well.  This fear, along with frequent move-along orders force people into more remote, less secure settings where the risk of being a victim of a crime increases, and the constant fear of being a victim poses detrimental health risks.  In addition, maintaining the current system is very expensive, it is far less costly on communities for people to have housing.  Policing the homeless for their mere status of being unhoused overcrowds our court system and our jails and diverts much-needed resources away from addressing crime that is a real threat to public safety. With limited resources, preventing noncriminal interactions with the police should be a priority.

The immediate recommendations below are proposed short-term policy changes to minimize the risk of spreading COVID-19 and until additional temporary sheltering locations have been established.  This is in the best interests of all citizens of Eugene, housed and unhoused.

Recommendation 1.

Define places where sheltering in place, including sheltering in a vehicle, is prohibited at all times, such as residential areas*, within 15 feet of building entrances and the Downtown Activity Zone (other cities have enacted similar measures). *Excluding sanctioned shelter sites (e.g. Rest Stops).

Recommendation 2.

City Council should direct law enforcement to follow CDC guidance and not disperse existing temporary shelters to other locations as long as there are no violations such as private property trespass or other criminal behavior, and the site does not pose a significant health and safety risk that outweighs the need for individuals to shelter in place.  It is important to note that there are several examples around the country of cities that modified their enforcement practices in the past few years with respect to laws that disproportionately impact the unhoused, including practices to minimize closure of encampments until viable shelter or housing becomes available.

Establish guidelines for people in unsanctioned sites to protect health and safety and to reduce the need for law enforcement to shut down a temporary shelter site. It must be clearly communicated that unsanctioned camping is a violation of Eugene Code 4.815, Prohibited Camping, and therefore the site could be closed by EPD at any time. The purpose of these guidelines is to give individuals concrete information to help them maintain a healthy, safe living situation that does not interfere with surrounding residents and businesses.

Recommendation 3.

Establish an alternative dispatch system to using law enforcement when a complaint only involves prohibited camping and there is no threat to public safety or crisis response necessary. Instead of directing callers to the Eugene Police Department’s non-emergency line or Public Works, create a “One Point of Contact” type reporting system available online or by phone staffed by trained information and referral specialists (possibly managed by designated nonprofit) to assess resource needs, track interactions, and provide follow up communication.

Supporting groups might include adequately trained service-based nonprofits, faith organizations, businesses, or neighborhood associations.

Recommendation 4.

Require non-EPD sworn officers as the first responders when a complaint only involves prohibited camping and there is no threat to public safety (in addition to the City’s outreach team, this could involve CSO’s and possibly designated nonprofits). This would reduce EPD’s expenses and is more likely to result in a positive outcome with the unhoused.

Partnerships with security agencies could provide support when problems occur to assist support teams and divert the need for police involvement. Supporting groups to serve as responders could include service-based nonprofits, faith organizations, businesses, and neighborhood associations.


In Support:

Service Providers

Laurie Hauber, Staff Attorney, Oregon Law Center/Lane County Legal Aid

Heather Sielicki, White Bird Clinic Operations Coordinator

Alex Farmer, White Bird Clinic Front Rooms Program Coordinator

Benjamin Brubaker, White Bird Clinic Executive Director

Chris Hecht, White Bird Clinic Executive Director

CN Applegate, White Bird Board of Directors, VP

Priscilla Gould, Chair PacificSource Foundation for Community Health and Retired United Way of Lane County Executive Director

Dan Bryant, SquareOne Villages

Kirstin London, Human Rights Commission

Wayne Martin, Nightingale, House Everyone, and pastor

Amanda Hampton, Looking Glass Rural Program Supervisor

Amanda Hampton, Program Supervisor, Looking Glass Rural Program

Douglas L. Bovee, MD, Community Supported Shelters, Board President

Carrie Copeland, Community Supported Shelters Board Secretary

Terry McDonald, Executive Director, St. Vincent De Paul

Mike Yoshioka, St. Vincent de Paul of Lane County Youth and Family Services Manager

Elaine Walters, Trauma Healing Project

Paul Solomon, Sponsors Executive Director

Laura Johnson, Sponsors Director of Program Development and Amazon Neighbors

Michelle Hankes, ShelterCare Executive Director

Renee Yandel, Executive Director, HIV Alliance


Faith Community

Rabbi Ruhi Sophia Motzkin Rubenstein, Temple Beth Israel

Ruba Byrd, Pastor, Eugene Friends Church

Eugene Sufi Council

Sheryl Balthrop, Eugene Mission Executive Director

Julie O’Hara, Executive Pastor, Eugene First – Church of the Nazarene


Nick Ciufo, President, Tao Gardens

Dan Issacson, CEO, Nakd Farms

Neighborhood Association Boards

Neighborhood Leaders Council

Jefferson Westside Neighbors

Friendly Area Neighbors

Northeast Neighbors

Southwest Hills Neighborhood Association

Southeast Neighbors

South University Neighbors Association

Neighborhood Association Board Members

Anne Millhollen, Chair, Neighborhood Leaders Council Committee on Housing and Homelessness and North East Neighbors, East Area (1) Representative

David Saul, South Eugene Neighbors, Board member

Ian Winbrock, Co-Chair, Neighborhood Leaders Council, At-large board member, Whitaker Community Council

Kara Steffensen, Chair of Amazon Neighbors Association

Melissa Takush, Board Member and Social Media Manager, Amazon Neighbors Association

Rachael Latimer, Board Member, Amazon Neighbors Association


Steve Piercy, Co-Chair, Friendly Area Neighbors Transportation Committee

Branden B. Johnson, resident of Eugene, JWN, and Ward 1 for the past 7 years

Richard Self aka Sam Broadway KEPW Newsday, Eugene

Debbie Hebert, South Eugene Neighbors

Jay Mosely, JWN and Westside Shelter Search Team

David Huffman, Jefferson Westside Neighbors

Stephanie J. Coopman, Jefferson Westside Neighbors

Nancy Hafner, Jefferson Westside Neighbors

Chris O’Neill, Jefferson Westside Neighbors

Paul and Peggy Boudin, Jefferson Westside Neighbors

Vanessa Wheeler, Jefferson Westside Neighbors

Sharon Hawks, Jefferson Westside Neighbors

Derek Lamson, N/A

Susan Lax, Southeast Neighbors

With Caveats

Lane Independent Living Alliance: LILA supports the recommendations, but we ask for specific wording “accessible sites” as this is essential for people who experience disability.


Based on popular demand, we are holding a June General Meeting (normally we do not meet June, July, and August). The meeting is via Zoom, Tuesday, June 9, from 6:30-8:30.We will be discussing the start of our Residential Parking Permit process for the area around Monroe Park (see below) and neighborhood resilience efforts.

Contact us for an access code.


Monroe Park Residential Parking Permit Zone

Fact Sheet

The permits pay for the patrols and signage. Citations comprise less that 20% of revenue.

Why Consider a Permit Zone?

  • Parking control officers do not ordinarily patrol areas without a permit zone because the zone pays for the officer’s time. So, parking rules are more evenly enforced, which improves street safety.
  • Permits eliminate multi-day car camping, but do allow for “one-and-done” overnight sleeping in vehicles because there is no overnight enforcement. This mitigates problematic car camping behavior while not burdening respectful campers.
  • Permits eliminate “remote storage” of vehicles.
  • Permits expedite the removal of abandoned vehicles.
  • Permits create a cost for what might be an extra vehicle, thus encouraging people to donate or sell it.
  • Permits encourage people to use available off-street parking, thus freeing up on-street parking for guests and those with no other options.
  • Residential on-street parking is a benefit that is paid by all but used by just some.

Issues with Permit Parking

  • Costs: Even a minimal cost is still an extra expenditure, which can be an added burden for low-income residents.
  • Hassle: Having to take the time to get a permit and renew it.
  • Equity: If you have no off-street parking where you live, you are forced into buying a permit whereas those with off-street parking do not.

Proposed Zone Area

Border on the north but not including W. 8th Ave

Bordered on the south but not including W. 11th

Bordered on the west but not including Jefferson

Bordered on the east by Van Buren

Proposed/rules based on city standards

  • Days per week: Monday through Sunday
  • Hours per day 24: enforced 8-6 (approximately) Monday-Saturday (may expand). You can park over-night and as long as you are gone by 9 you are okay.
  • Free parking no permit: 2 hours


What does it cost?

  • $40 per permit per year (currently)*.
  • That comes to: .11 cents per day, .77 cents a week, or $3.33 a month


Who can get a permit?

  • You must be able to prove residency (same requirements as a library card)
  • Residences and permits are determined by tax lot
  • The process is 100% online (no stickers/based on license plates).


How does it work?

  • Maximum of 5 yearly permits (can get two year permits on request for homeowners or long-term renters [4+ years]) per tax lot.
  • *You can assign up unlimited vehicles per permit, but only one can use it at a time
  • Up to 30 single day use permits per month (free) per tax lot. You can assign as many single-day permits at a time (so a guest that stays for a week would use up 7 single day permits)
  • More than a single day guest permit or over the 30 permits may be obtained by calling. For example, a free service permit for contractors or home healthcare staff based on the contract.


 How does the process work?

  • Tentative boundaries are submitted to Parking who calculates if the zone is financially viable (pays for itself via permits).
  • Basic rules are proposed.
  • All residences are notified via postcard within the proposed zone + 2 blocks in every direction.
  • Volunteers canvas to ask questions and get votes.
  • Lease holders (on contract) get half a vote (if 5 people, they get ½ vote)
  • All Lease holders (on contract) in multifamily dwellings + get half a vote.
  • Dwelling owners get half a vote.
  • Owner occupiers get a full vote.
  • Half vote if house on corner for each street.
  • The vote is simple majority but technically advisory, the traffic engineer has the final say based on set criteria if the vote is close.



What if I don’t want to be in the permit zone?

  • Before the zone is established you can file a request to be exempted. However, this means the street in front of your property will be clearly excluded from the zone by signage so if likely to attract a lot of vehicles. No recommended.
  • Area directly outside a permit zone tend to get bigger parking impacts.